I’m not much of a collector. Other than Legos, cats, and assorted piles of disorganization, I’m not very good at collecting anything. But if I were going to start a serious collection of something — and if I had unlimited cash — I’d probably collect swords.
I guess I already do collect swords, in a way. But setting aside sporting and practice implements, I’ve got two. And excluding reproductions, I have a collection of exactly one sword:
This is a patag, or patang. It’s from the mid-late 1800s and it’s Bhutanese in origin — though it was sold to me as a “Tibetan sword.” Granted, my grasp of the details of Himalayan political boundaries in the 19th century is not particularly keen, so I’m not really sure whether Tibetan and Bhutanese swords from the era can readily be distinguished.
It’s got a fine wirework handle:
There are a couple of points that appear to be damage or imperfections in the wirework — including what appears to be a nail that might be securing the wirework to the wooden foundation of the handle. I don’t know whether that’s supposed to be there or not. I believe the wirework is genuine silver but I haven’t investigated too closely.
It’s got a pattern-welded steel blade:
The blade is about 2 feet in length and has some rather pretty lamination. I haven’t attempted to clean up the blade at all, lest any cleanup work affect the patina. That said, it’s still decently sharp.
The patang is clearly a chopping weapon, given the severely squared off configuration of the tip. My understanding is that this is the standard pattern for this type of sword.
It’s got an awesome scabbard, which is made of wood, covered in ray skin and leather, with a metal (possibly silver?) ferrule covering the bottom third. The ferrule is a bit loose and there’s some damage to the leather, but it’s otherwise intact. The bright green rayskin jacket I have seen referred to as “shagreen” leather, though in the auction guide for the sale of this weapon it’s misconstrued as “shagris.”
For a sword collection of one item, it’s not a bad way to start. Unfortunately, the collection hasn’t grown in almost 15 years and I’m beginning to lose heart.
More on Patangs
I’m not 100% sure that this item is Bhutanese rather than Tibetan, as mentioned above. But so far as I’ve seen, examples of weapons identified as Bhutanese tend to be more similar to this one than those identified as Tibetan.
Here’s some examples and other findings.
- The scabbard of this item is a dead ringer for mine.
- The overall configuration of this one on display at the Met is very similar to my specimen, though this example has a metal scabbard and a less rounded-off tip.
- The Wikipedia page for patang provides some good background that might explain the variations in design, but it’s woefully light on specifics.
- I’ve definitely seen evidence that modern patangs look a lot like historical ones, including suggestions of intentional deception about weapon age. But I know a little bit of the provenance of this particular sword so I’m somewhat confident it’s authentically dated to the 19th century.
I bought this weapon for $500 at an antiques fair in 2002 or 2003, from Charles M. Brown, the proprietor of China Trader Antiques in Marion, MA. The asking price was $850, but I think he saw my eyes light up when I spied the weapon and he severely dropped the price. He also kindly let me pay in installments of $100 a month. I paid him dutifully for two months, then forgot for a few months and then contritely sent him the balance in a lump sum. I still feel bad about that.
Mr. Brown acquired the weapon in an auction out of Eldred’s auction house of East Dennis, MA., in July of 2002. The sale was for the estate of one Jane Culver Sargent. This was lot number 229 of the auction. The purchase price was $425 plus commission. So Mr. Brown did me a serious favor, pricewise.
The auction catalog summarizes the sword thus:
TIBETAN SWORD Late 19th Century With wirework handle. Shagris scabbard. Length of blade, 24 1/2″.
The low and high estimates for the sword are $250 and $350, which seems… pessimistic, especially in retrospect. Incidentally, I’ve seen similar swords on sale in the $1000 range here and there, though who knows what they actually end up going for.
The auction catalog also provides the following context for the collection:
The estate of Jane Culver Sargent of Brookline was built on the collection of her father-in-law Porter Edward Sargent, who, prior to World War I, developed “Round the World School”. Between 1909 and 1914 this school was offered to the elite youth of New England. After graduation from secondary school, young men were taken on travels through the Middle and Far East by steamer. During these tours Mr. Sargent would offer classes in Oriental culture. At the same time he collected interesting pieces to illustrate his lectures and to bring home for friends. By 1925 when he purchased a large home in Brookline, he had a vast collection that so filled his home, that much of it had to be packed away. Many of the items were still wrapped in newspaper dating from the 1920’s when Eldred’s staff began their inventory.
(Wikipedia link to Porter Sargent added by me.)
Although the provenance trail ends here (so far), the contextual evidence suggests to me that this item is the Real Deal.
That’s my sword collection. Maybe some day it’ll actually be, you know, a collection.
7 thoughts on “It’s a sword! The Bhutanese Patang/Patag”
Hi, Not sure you will get this as it comes long after your posting. Not sure you ever got more information. Here is a resources you could check for as PDF file to shed some light on the Patang:
PATAG-THE SYMBOL OF HEROES by Phuntsho Rapten.
I got a very similar sword during a trek in a remote district on the Tibetan plateau in Nepal. In the former KIngdom’s capital it was offered for sale to me. I was also said to be an heirloom from a Khampa warrior family that had fought the Chinese invaders to Tibet. In the resource I mention above it also says that some of the Bhutanese Patangs were particularly popular with the Khampa tribe.
One more thing, look at the back (blunt) side of the sword close to the edge. If it is marked with an +/x it is considered a defiled blade because it has killed someone or many people in battle. It is a highly venerated thing though, the “defiled” part is so because in their religion killing is very loaded and a dirty thing. But among warriors and in families it seems this is something that is also very special. I just checked my blade after having it for 6 years and lo and behold it had an x at the back…makes it a bit more special. This is definitely a treasure I will keep.
Small edit: the “x” is engraved at the blunt side close to the hilt.
This is fascinating. I’m going to check my sword as soon as I get home. And I’m going to look for that PDF! Thanks so much.
No X that I can see on mine. Oh well, that would have been pretty neat! Thanks again for the info.
please do let me know if you want to sell it at firstname.lastname@example.org. thanks.
Hi Greek O Rican,
That’s a nice sword. I’m passionate for with that Himalayan type of sword.
May I ask you to contact me if you want to part with ?
Have a great day,
Sorry I did a mistake with the email. Better if you respond me to that one !
thanks in advance,